lifeinthemixtalk.com

Exploring That Which Is Hidden

Archive for the 'ACC. PEEL PARK PRIMARY SCHOOL : DECEPTION & LIES' Category

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually

Posted by admin on 17th April 2010

What Are We To Make Of This?




Now a very interesting development has occurred today 16 April 2010, I received an acknowledgement thus far not forthcoming since I first made my complaint to the ICO and the DPA in March 2010. I sent two emails one to the ICO and one to the DPA on March 15, I received no acknowledgement, I sent the same again via email on the 17 March and still no acknowledgement for my complaints.

I then sent the same complaints via letter in the mail, and still no acknowledgement.

April 15 one month after my initial complaints were sent, I placed the fact that I had still not received any form of acknowledgement on the website page which covered this action, and low and behold the following day April 16 out of the blue I received the following acknowledgement :

16th April 2010

Case Reference Number FS50301514

Dear Mr Young

Thank you for your correspondence dated 15/03/10 and 24/03/10, please accept my apologies for the delay in responding to your complaint.

There are multiple public authorities and data controllers mentioned in your complaint and I will need to split out the relevant information for each organisation before deciding how best to proceed. This is likely to mean that new cases will be set up for each organisation but I will confirm this as soon as I am able.

Should you wish to contact us about this matter please call our Helpline on 0303 123 1113 and quote the above case reference number.

Yours sincerely

Jim Dunn

FOI Case Officer

FoI Case Reception Unit

The Information Commissioner’s Office

End of Reply


I then sent a reply thanking Jim Dunn for his acknowledgement, and later in the day received the following :


16th April 2010

Case Reference Number FS50301514

Dear Mr Young

Further to my email of earlier today I have now had the opportunity to review the correspondence you submitted on 15/03/10. Unfortunately I am not in a position to progress your complaint at this time, nor to determine how many and what type of separate case references I need to set up.

In your complaint you mention Peel Park Primary School , Lancashire Fire Service, Lancashire Police Constabulary, Lancashire Resilience Forum and Lancashire County Council. You include four ‘references’ and a copy of a request to Superintendent O’Dwyer but there is important information missing from each request. We require you to provide unedited copies of your information requests. We acknowledge that you have provided the content of those requests, however, where correspondence is sent via email we also require the transmission information, usually contained in the header and footer of the email. Such unedited correspondence provides us with information such as the date the correspondence was sent and who it was sent to, which we may require in order to carry out our assessment.

You also make reference to a response received from Peel Park Primary School , can you please provide a copy of that response. If they have refused to release information under the Freedom of Information Act we would expect that, before accepting your complaint, you have allowed the public authority the opportunity to respond to any arguments which applicants may make as to why the information they request should be released. If you haven’t already done so, we would advise you to first ask the public authority to reconsider its refusal of your request. If you are dissatisfied with the outcome of the internal review, providing the documents mentioned above and the following:

· Your request for a review;

· The School’s review of the decision.

If you have had formal refusals from any of the other public authorities you will have to show that you have gone through the ‘review’ process in each case.

You make other references to the fact that the school “refused to comply” but do not indicate whether the refusal to comply was confirmed in writing or whether your requests were simply ignored. Can you please elaborate on the position and provide copies of the relevant correspondence.

From the correspondence you have sent to this office it is possible that some of the information you have requested may be personal data relating to you as an individual, or your son. Requests for your own personal data should be treated as a subject access request under the Data Protection Act, rather than a Freedom of Information request.

We first need to determine which elements of the data you have requested from the organisations in question can be considered as being your personal data before we look into your rights of access under the Freedom of Information Act.

When the subject access matters you have raised are confirmed, and we have all the supporting evidence to hand, the case will be assigned to one of our Data Protection casework teams before being allocated to a case officer to pursue. You will be informed when this has been done.

Once the Data Protection Act subject access matters have been addressed we will look at any remaining FOI issues. We will ensure that any remaining FOI element of your complaint will be assigned to a complaints resolution team within the same timescale that would have applied had the subject access element not needed to be addressed first.

Lastly, your requests at time appear to take the form of questions asked of the public authority. You will no doubt be aware that under the FOIA you have the right to access recorded information held by public authorities. The Act does not require public authorities to generate information or to answer questions, provide explanations or give opinions, unless this is recorded information that they already hold.

Your case has been closed but will be reopened when you submit the additional information requested above. Please remember to quote the reference number form the top of this letter in future correspondence.

Should you have any questions about this please contact our Helpline on 0303 123 1113.

Yours sincerely,

Jim Dunn

FoI Case Officer

FoI Case Reception Unit

The Information Commissioner’s Office

End of Reply


You may call me suspicious but having spent the last couple of years playing in the arena of FOI, if there is one thing our civil service does at every point, is to play for time. Jim Dunn has closed the complaint, again playing for time.

This is based in the gigantic play currently in full swing by the civil service against my good self, well I am good some of the time, and as such they are counting on my demolition by the same so they can carry on deceiving and lying to you all, should they be successful in stopping my work.


Monday 19 April I resent the complaints to the Information Commissioners Office with the requested information as attachments.


Further Study

Information Commissioners Office

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response

Second Response Under Order Of Information Commissioners Office

Third  FOI Response : Lancashire Resilience Forum



The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions


_________________________

_____________

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in I. ICO REPLY | No Comments »

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Posted by admin on 22nd March 2010

lifeinthemix Makes Complaint To Data Protection Act And ICO



 

Introduction

After receiving a reply from the Governors themselves which completely backs up the replies received so far in this diatribe of sanity, lifeinthemix has decided to make full complaint to both the DPA (Data Protection Act) and ICO (Information Commissioners Office). I sent the complaints via email on two occasions; first on March 15th 2010 and the second on March 17 2010, today is March 22, and I have still to receive a response.

I sent both complaints to this email address :

 

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/

 

The Complaint

Dear Sir/Madame

 

On October 23 2009, I and all parents of children attending Peel Park Primary School were sent a text message to say our children would not be released.

Upon investigating the whole issue I found many aspects of what I was being told, or not being told, held basis for suspicion, we were not and continue not to be told the real reason for the action taken by Lancashire Fire Service, the Lancashire Police Constabulary, the Lancashire Resilience Forum, Lancashire County Council, and Peel Park School.

The way my requests have been handled to the point they have tried to demolish any means of my getting information I am entitled to as a taxpaying British citizen, has been one bordering on malicious slander and defamation.

 

Sir/ Madame, I would ask that you look at the following criteria on which I claim all parties thus named, have broken the FOI Act requirements :

 

1.) Friday November 13 2009, I made a simple request direct to the school, first to the Office Manager who passed me onto a teacher ; Mrs. Lauder, I asked the school to ensure all my sons school work to be brought home so I may look through the curriculum being taught to my son.

The school refused claiming they had to follow the guidelines from Lancashire Education Authority, I reminded Mrs. Lauder that a guideline is not an command and thus the school had elected to implement these rulings on the guidance of the LEA.

I then requested the school send me a copy of the guidelines which LEA say the school must comply within seven days. [1]

Today is Sunday 15 March 2010, I have received no guidelines and I have yet to see any school work, I ask you to ensure the school supplies the lawful authority on which they can refuse the parent of a child the right to study the curriculum at home without the hindrance of a teacher.

2.) I made a request to see all the data the school have collected on my child and the family, the legal advise I have received says I have an absolute right to this information, yet the school has refused to comply. [1]

3.) I requested a copy list of all organisations the school had and continue to share the collected information with, again upon legal advice I am informed I have an absolute right to this information, the school has refused to comply. [1]

4.) I requested a full account as to why the school acted without verifying the initial call had indeed come from the police, the school have refused to comply. [1]

5.) I requested a full account as to why the school left parents, toddlers and babies in the school yard if the move of holding the children in the school was all about Health & Safety, the school has refused to comply. [1]

6.) I requested a full list to show each member of staff who in relation to the Resilience doctrine, held positions under which they acted not as a civil servant, but answered to the dictate of the LRF, something the taxpayer is not aware is going on, the school have refused to comply. [1]

7.) I have been accused of a falsehood, and requested a full written statement from the head; Mrs Judith Williams and Deputy Head; Mr Henderson fully detailing their claims that I was aggressive and intimidating, the school has refused to comply. [3]

According to my legal advice I am entitled to supporting objective evidence as an absolute right, and the right to challenge its provenance, accuracy and legitimacy

8.) The school claimed I was aggressive and intimidating as I handed out the leaflets, that the school received complaints in this regard, I requested copies of these statements, the school refused to comply. [3]

 

Again according to my legal advice I am entitled to REDACTED reports.

 

9.) I also made a request as to the reason I could not study the careers of the school governors from the school website, the school refused to comply, I therefore ask do the school governors have the right to act in any way contrary to total transparency, as our children exist while at school under their responsibility, and are the recipients of the decisions they make. **

10.) The school took it upon itself to ban me from the school premises, I requested the lawful authority on which a school, albeit acting via a Lancashire County Council solicitor, thought they could not only enforce the law and thus impersonate a police Constable, but make judgement as if they were the courts, the school refused to comply. [3]

According to my legal advice I am entitled to the supporting objective evidence, with the right to challenge, of any accusation made against me that was subsequently used as the basis to impose prejudice or sanction.

11.) Could you also look at reference [4] and advise as to how a public body Lancashire Fire Service, can fail to comply with the FOI request.

12.) I requested from the school as to who from the school governors had undergone the One Stop Shop course, the school refused to comply. [2]

13.) The first FOI I made to Lancashire Resilience Forum, was answered by superintendent Peter O’Dwyer of Lancashire Police Constabulary, who informed me that he had taken advice and had been told the LRF was not a public body and thus did not need to conform to FOI.

I then sent an FOI to Superintendent O’Dwyer in his role as a Police Constable, and asked :

 

Under FOI Act 2000

 

16 November 2009

 

Dear Superintendent O Dwyer

Thank you for your response dated 16 November 2009

Given the Lancashire Police are still a public body could you please supply me with the following information :

If you are the chair of the LLRF, then the fact you are a public servant would question the idea the LLRF are not indeed a public authority, could you please supply the relevant information on which your advice is based.

Could you please supply the name of the body and personnel from which you Peter O Dwyer Superintendent of Lancashire Police received your advice.

Could you please supply a copy of the advise you received which gives the LLRF the ability to dictate policy to the Lancashire  politic while immune from FOI.

Could you please supply the exact title and role of the LLRF and why sitting atop the LLRF is a public servant.

Could I ask your understanding as a chief superintendent of the term; ‘Misprisien of Treason’, and the actual legal or lawful meaning of the term.

Best regards

 

I have no reply outside the acknowledgement of the request, I sent another email after the 20 days elapsed, received yet another acknowledgement but still no reply to the request, could you please investigate this issue.

Best regards

sean young

 

References :

 

1.]

Under FOI Act 2000

 

02 November 2009

Dear Mrs. Williams

In light of two previous conversations I have had with you, both occasions in which I required answers to questions posed, I found you to be very deceptive in your manner and extremely evasive in your answers to the point you said a lot without actually answering the questions posed. It is on that basis I feel the only way we can communicate is via freedom of information requests which you are legally obliged to answer.

In light of the first issue and conversation which was in relation to Miss Jones and her suggestion to the mother of my child in Miss Jones class, that she send in the requested medical information I had withheld, her exact words were : would you like to sneak in the information.

This of course presents the idea the school is in the position of getting all the requested information at all costs even against the wishes of the parents, deceptive coercion is the event carried out by your school in the fist instant, I need to know from whence this criteria has its root.

Miss Jones moved again against my wishes and again approached the mother of my child on March 12, 2010, this time with success. Is this behaviour acceptable?

On that basis I formerly request :

A full copy of the qualifications of Miss Jones, her employment record and position at your school.

A copy of the action you Mrs. Williams took after I had made you aware of the issue.

Why you failed to respond to my many requests that you call me back given I could not get hold of you myself to further explore the issue at hand.

I request a copy of your rulings in relation to gathering information from parents by any and all means.

I also request a copy of all data you hold on my son, including all data you have accrued via role play lessons, lessons in which you have the children describe their home environment, ie, getting up, tea time and going to bed.

I request a copy of all bodies you the school Peel Park  are mandated to then give out this collected data, be they governmental or private.

Could you please supply a copy of the all staff at your school and their contingency positions as directed via the Lancashire Resilience Forum, including the position in this regard held by you Mrs. Williams.

I request a copy of the school contingency planning document under which you are currently operating, the names of all governors mandated to this planning also.

Could you please supply me with the below details in relation to the school withholding pupils from the parents on Friday 23rd October 2009 :

Log number : LC/2009 10230796. Who took the call from the police and at what time was the call taken

Who verified the call was indeed from the police

From whom did the call come from and from which station

What steps where taken to protect the children and parents in the school yard waiting to collect the children inside the school given you were concerned for the safety of the children inside the school, as you made clear in our very brief phone conversation on Monday 2 November 2009, a conversation on which you hung up

On what criteria did you then decide to release the children as you said again in our phone conversation 2 November, 4 minutes after you decided to keep the children inside.

Why did the school communicate only via text message to the parents, and under what criteria was this determined.

Could you supply the minutes of your last seven resilience – Contingency meetings held within your school.

Could you supply a list of all resilience – Contingency meetings you yourself Mrs. Williams have attended since taking the role of head at Peel Park.

 

Fingerprints.

Could you please supply me with the legal criteria which determined that you could take my sons fingerprints without any consent his parents.

More to follow

Best regards

 

2.]

Under FOI Act 2000

18 November 2009

Dear Mrs. Williams.

Could you please confirm which governors at Peel park have undergone the course :

School Governors One Stop Shop

Secondly :

The LEA informed me that it is your remit to present the LEA guidelines thus requested by me relating to the denial to allow me to study the exercise books of my son, they also said you have seven days in which to reply. This second request is thus formalised in writing I await your response.

Regards

sean young

3.]

Under FOI Act 2000

 

07 December 2009

Dear Peel Park and Lynn Brewer solicitor.

I received a letter from LCC and a solicitor named Lynn Brewer on 18 November 2009 in which the most horrendous diatribe of lies were laid against me

First the letter claims I gave out the leaflets on November 9th…it was November 10th.

Mr Henderson also played along with the fantasy of Mrs. Williams when he relayed the idea I was approached in the school yard on the basis I was not known to the school…rather difficult to conclude with Mr Henderson coming out of the building with the words; ‘Mr Young, may I ask what you are doing’.

I therefore request a full written statement by Mr. Henderson to the event of November 10 2009, to which the letter claims I was not known to the school, I require Mr Henderson’s full account as to how this could be so given my fourteen years contact with the school and Mr Henderson.

Mrs. Williams and I presume Mr Henderson, also claimed my manner to be aggressive in its tone, this again is a monumental lie.

I therefore request a full written statement from Mr Henderson and Mrs. Williams of the exact script of the conversation had outside the school entrance on November 10 2009.

The letter states it has received complaints from concerned parents who claim I was aggressive and intimidating.

I therefore request a full copy of all parents with a statement of their complaints made to the school.

The letter then attempts to dictate how I can communicate with the school, they want everything in writing, email and phone calls banned.

I request a detailed copy of the legal criteria on which such a demand can be made.

 

4.]

Under FOI Act 2000

 

Dear sir,

In relation to the chemical spillage Burnley Road Huncoat on October 23 2009, could you please provide the following information :

Why and who determined Hyndburn Sports Centre as a centre for the evacuated persons.

From which Red Cross base did the Red Cross staff on scene at Hyndburn Sports Centre have their origin.

Why three minutes before school ended was Peel Park  primary ordered to hold the children in school when the school is clearly half a mile away from the accident scene.

Could you supply the full cv for Gary Hargreaves and a fuller account of his power in this type of scenario and as he played out that power in today’s event.

Could you confirm or not the role played, if any, by any Capita Symonds personnel directly or indirectly.

Best regards

sean young

P.S. The school has claimed my behaviour to be vexatious, they have not claimed the requests themselves to be so, therefore miss-using section 14. Should you require any further information on the topics thus far covered, please ask.

 

More to follow………..

I received no response from two emails sent to the ICO and Data Protection, so I sent each department a written letter, today is Thursday 13 April and I have still received no acknowledgement from the Commissioner himself, to whom the written letters were sent.

What does this tell you of the country in which we live?

I will not accept this behaviour, nor should you.

 

 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually

 

__________________________

____________


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in H. COMPLAINT ICO | No Comments »

Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Posted by admin on 25th January 2010

Here We Have It From The Horses Mouth, ‘We The School Will Answer No Questions Presented To Us We Do Not Want To Answer’


Here We Have Peel Park Taking It Upon Itself To Re – Define Journalism…

Journalism Is Now Vexation And Obsessive


Please note I received this letter Jan 5th

In Brackets [ ] My Emphasis

17th December 2009

Dear Mr Young

 

We are writing in response to your letter dated 7 December 2009 and to advise you that in accordance with section 14 (1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the act) your requests for information will not be further processed on the grounds that they are clearly vexatious.

Having considered the nature of your correspondence with the school and other public authorities [school is now claiming to be an authority, and now laying claim to my past investigations into the council and police, presenting the reality for you all to see that we are indeed dealing with one massive network] over a sustained period of time, your enquiry can only be construed as being intended to cause harassment and an abuse of the rights conferred by the legislation. Furthermore, it indicates an obsessive pattern of behaviour which if unchecked is likely to continue with no end in sight.

[Very revealing in the last sentence...Lisa Hartley (Chair of Governors) is making it very clear they have no intention of ever answering my questions which gives them the ability to suggest this will go on without end, then as is the strategy of reverse psychology, they throw personal insult against I. Here we see an exact copy of the Common Purpose strategy, to label my good self in the eyes of those who will see this action. Not at any time during this investigation has the school or Lancashire County Council solicitor; Lynn Brewer addressed the real issues to which I have requested information, which is the whole basis for this action, they answer with personal attacks on my person and sideline the real issues which are :

I want to see all data the school has collected on my child and also my family.

I want a copy of all organisations the school has shared this data with.

I want to know why the school failed to verify the call from the police.

I want to know why the school left babies, parents and toddlers in the yard.

I want to know the positions of each teacher and other staff as they operate the Resilience Forum's doctrine.

I want a written statement from Judith Williams and Mr Henderson to prove their accusation that I was aggressive and intimidating.

I want a copy of the reports the school say they received from parents who claimed I was aggressive and intimidating.

I want to know why I cannot look at the career of the governors from the Peel Park website.

I want to know under what legal doctrine the school feels it can ban my good self from the school yard.

I want to see all my child's school work

I want to see the guidelines under which the school has the right to refuse full and unobserved access to my child's school work

They have refused to supply the guidelines breaking the seven day ruling by Lancashire County Council

This school controlled by its governors are breaking the LCC doctrine, they are refusing to comply with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, they are throwing out slander and defamation of character against my good self, they have the audacity to employ a civil servant to act on their behalf against a taxpayer, they believe they have the right to tell you the parent what is and what is not with your children, they are collecting data via the school curriculum about your family  and they are then handing over this data to the government and because of the foundation status, they are handing this data to charities and corporate interests.]

We are of the opinion that to divert publicly funded resources in the pursuit of dealing with enquiries of this nature lies outside the requirements of the Act, the spirit and provisions of which the school wholeheartedly supports.

[Lisa Hartley is now using the finance aspect as to why they do not need to inform parents what they are actually not doing, which is to educate our children in the way most believe their children are taught]

We will adopt the same approach should any similar requests be received in the future, whether from you or any other applicant.

[Any other applicant means you]

The school does not provide a procedure for dealing with complaints regarding the handling of requests for information. As such, in the event that you consider that your request has not been dealt with in accordance with part 1 of the act, you can apply to the Information Commissioner for a decision.

[The school does not provide a procedure...the school has a duty to provide procedure, you must see what is being said here by the Governors. They are making it up as they go along which is I would suggest is still part of the overall Contingency-Resilience drill, they want to test their ability to shut down all enquiries into the Contingency state.]

[For the school to be so brazen in presenting the complaints commissioner details, suggests the Commissioner will support the school on its stance, and will more than lightly base his conclusion on the lies presented by the school Governors in their defamation of my good self]

 

The Case Reception Unit

Customer Service team

The Information Commissioners Office

Wycliffe House

Water lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire

SK95AF

 

Should you have any legitimate information requirements at any time in the future, we would be happy to assist you.

 

Yours Sincerely

Lisa Hartley

Chair of Governors

 

So the school is determining FOI criteria.

 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

I Take Action : Complaint Made To Information Commissioners Office


Further Study

In Profile : Peel Park Foundation School

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response




________________________________

________________





Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in BRITISH POLITICS, EDUCATION, G. GOVERNORS REPLY | No Comments »

Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Posted by admin on 12th January 2010

Yet More Garbage From Lynn Brewer, The Public Paid Solicitor Acting For A Private Corporation Against Taxpayers



Lynn Brewer begins her response with yet another lie. I received this letter on December 11 2009, and the deceptive  madame has dated the letter December 4th, ah bless, is it possible Lynn thinks we are all short on comprehension and will fall for the idea…. Lynn is very concerned about the whole issue?

So let us look at what Resilience protocol Lynn Brewer wishes to reveal to the people of Lancashire and the parents of children attending Peel Park ‘maintained’ Foundation School :


scan0001


Page II

.

scan0002


I must ask you keep in mind with this response that we are dealing with the fact a civil servant in Lancashire, ( therefore I contribute to her salary), is acting for a maintained body, which although they are doing all they can not to admit the fact in writing,  equates to the school being a private corporation.

The letter is addressed to my good self, well I am good some of the time…. addressed to I the civil service master as a taxpayer, yet the servant is dictating terms for a private entity.


Lynn says :

Quote :

I am instructed by the governing body in relation to your requests for books and various other documentation/information from Peel Park School.

Reply :

First I need to understand which school Lynn is acting for, is it Peel Park County Primary, or Peel Park Foundation School? It matters, because depending under which title she acts for determines the rules of the game. County means accountable and Foundation means secret and not accountable

Quote :

I am advised that you have recently been making repeated requests for various documents and information from the school, the latest being that your child’s text and or exercise books be sent home in order you can check the curriculum being followed in the school and that you be supplied with copies of homework that you completed with your child which I understand has now been supplied to you.

Reply :

I had to make repeated requests because the answers were not forthcoming, and although they have said I cannot have the books at home, I still demand an answer as to what legal criteria they are in the position to refuse the parent of a child the ability to follow the curriculum as it is taught in the schools. Until this question is answered then as for as I am concerned the school is hiding something they do not want parents to see.

They have supplied me with one particular homework task, I have asked for a copy of all the school work which is primarily created for the collection of data about the families of the children. This of course is a big part of what the schools are hiding with their refusal to allow the parents to see the curriculum, because to get a good Ofsted report the schools have to be excelling at data collection which is then sent onto government departments, The fact Peel Park is now a Foundation maintained school, this data is now accessible by seriously dubious corporate interests which lifeinthemix has worked hard to expose and bring to the attention of the people.

So Lynn Brewer in this paragraph is attempting to present the idea the requests have been satisfied, but of course they absolutely have not, nor shall I cease in my demand to see my child’s school work.

The letter continues :

Quote :

As you have been advised, the school, like many others do not send books home unless children are using them to complete homework. This is done for the very simple reason that it avoids books being lost and therefore creating unnecessary expenditure for the school and distress for the child when important work goes missing.

You are of course free to view your child’s work book on the occasions it is being used at home. In addition workbooks are sent home when complete. Should you wish to view any text book that is being used in the school, you can request a copy through the Lancashire Library Service.

The school have advised you that they are happy to allow parents to view their children’s work and indeed to discuss all aspects of their child’s education either by way of arranged appointment or more usually during parents evenings.

In addition as a maintained school, Peel Park  are required to follow the National Curriculum, the details of which are readily available from many sources including the Department for Children Schools and families, and the QCA websites. I understand that the school also provides parents with regular newsletters which explains the curriculum to be covered during the year.

If you are concerned about any aspect of your child’s education I would respectfully suggest you take advantage of the opportunities that are provided by the school to inform you of the content of the curriculum and of your child’s progress.

Finally due to the volume and nature of your recent correspondence with the school, the school will only be responding to communications from you regarding the day to day issues involving your child such as reporting absences,educational progress and visits.  all other correspondence will be forwarded to me once I have obtained my clients instructions in relation to them…

The letter is then signed.

Reply :

No, the reasons you have presented giving the school reason to refuse parents to see their child’s work has nothing to do whatever with your so called child protection doctrine, I remind you of the fact you withheld the children in the school building while leaving all the toddlers, babies and pregnant mothers in the yard, I wonder does Lynn get this dictate from Capita, the police via the Local Resilience Forum or Serco?

The reason the schools have all of a sudden stopped the free access to parents to the curriculum is because they are hiding the fact the schools are nothing other than data collection arms for the government and the corporations strewn throughout or education system, why are you being deceptive in this regard Lynn?

Not forgetting of course the constant need to have parents sign new written agreement forms as the schools expand their control remit over our children, which very deceptively hide the real purpose of these consent forms from the parents as the government dishes out more and more legislation for power of attorney over our children, with police and social workers in the schools supporting this power should a parent complain. As we can see in this letter, teachers are no longer in the mix as it were in relation to the education of the children, the police, psychologists County Council solicitors and social workers are the people one has to face when asking questions about the education of our children. Wake up people or lose your children as this madness builds in acceptance from society.

I have already made it very clear that the responses from the school  and from yourself, Lynn Brewer are not acceptable, I have pushed further for the legal status on which this refusal is based, you keep on avoiding the issues by responding with nonsense. I demand to see my child’s school work nothing less will suffice, I expect you only respond to this aspect of my requests instead of wasting paper on issues we have covered.

You are trying to send me everywhere apart from the school, is this because you are terrified the teachers will find out more than the Resilience wishes? Absolutely it is.

To say the least this response is pure garbage, it avoids every issue at every turn, regurgitates old news and moves ever further at complete and utter control of my ability to make contact with those I need to contact for the answers I seek. What Lynn has proved to date is the fact that the schools are indeed becoming little castles, out of the reach of the parents and any institution attempting to get information from the schools. Of course I have studied history enough to understand Castles serve a very important role as prisons, only it is our children within the walls of these very sinister Foundation Schools, but of course this is the same across the board as the corporate world takes over all assets belonging to the people of Great Britain. taking over our children

The schools are taking control of our children…tick…tock

When dictators hide behind the cloak of freedom…we have to make then show their true colours, Peel Park has served this agenda well.



 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually


Further Study

In Profile : Peel Park Foundation School

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response



_______________________________

_______________





Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in EDUCATION, F. P.P RESPOND | No Comments »

Update Peel Park Foundation School : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Posted by admin on 7th December 2009

lifeinthemix Responds To The LCC Solicitor Letter

 

Peel_Park_Masterplan

Here we have an update on the Peel Park issue which demands a full and detailed explanation relating to the school withholding children from the parents on Friday 23 October 2009. What we are witnessing is a Contingency Act drill, yet the school, police, the Lancashire Local Resilience Forum and Lancashire Fire Brigade, are all playing very naughty and deceptive games as I try to ascertain the organisations involved in the contingency drilling.

November 18 2009 I received a letter from Lynn Brewer, solicitor at Lancashire County Council :


scan0001Click Image to Enlarge


This is the formal letter as requested I sent to Peel Park and to Lynn Brewer Monday 7 December 2009 :


Under FOI Act 2000

Peel Park Foundation School & LCC

 

Dear Peel Park  and Lynn Brewer solicitor.

I received a letter from LCC and a solicitor named Lynn Brewer on 18 November 2009 in which the most horrendous diatribe of lies were laid against me

First the letter claims I gave out the leaflets on November 9th…it was November 10th.

Mr Henderson also played along with the fantasy of Mrs. Williams when he relayed the idea I was approached in the school yard on the basis I was not known to the school…rather difficult to conclude with Mr Henderson coming out of the building with the words; ‘Mr Young, may I ask what you are doing’.

I therefore request a full written statement by Mr. Henderson to the event of November 10 2009, to which the letter claims I was not known to the school, I require Mr Henderson’s full account as to how this could be so given my fourteen years contact with the school and Mr Henderson.

Mrs. Williams and I presume Mr Henderson, also claimed my manner to be aggressive in its tone, this again is a monumental lie.

I therefore request a full written statement from Mr Henderson and Mrs. Williams of the exact script of the conversation had outside the school entrance on November 10 2009.

The letter states it has received complaints from concerned parents who claim I was aggressive and intimidating.

I therefore request a full copy of all parents with a statement of their complaints made to the school.

The letter then attempts to dictate how I can communicate with the school, they want everything in writing, email and phone calls banned.

I request a detailed copy of the legal criteria on which such a demand can be made.

 

Thursday December 3 2009.

I rang Peel Park to remind them they had failed to comply with a FOI request made from my office on November 2 2009, I spoke with Elaine Everett (Staff Governor) who informed me that under instruction from the schools solicitor, they cannot speak with me the father of a child at the school.

I therefore request a copy of the legal criteria under which such a insidious demand can be enforced.

After the call to Elaine Everett, I called Lancashire County Council to speak with the solicitor responsible for the letter; Lynne Brewer, the number given on the letter is; 01772 530659, this number took me to a chap named Ian Longstaff, who was very perplexed as to why a legal letter from a solicitor would present the number for the Corporate Finance Department….

 

FOI directed to Lynne Brewer and LCC.

Ian gave me the number for Lynn Brewer and so I rang. Lynn answered the phone I introduced myself and asked under what legal criteria she Lynn Brewer had based what I termed nonsense within the letter; she asked which particular part, I replied all of it, I then asked :

Under what legal criteria the letter was based and did she think it was legally binding?

She went into the normal response, with the claim, it was not her job to offer me legal advice and she was not able to breech client confidentiality.

I reminded Lynn on several occasions that I was not asking her to breech any confidentiality that I had asked a direct question to her about the legal criteria under which she had based her demands in the letter she sent to me, again as they do, we get malfunction, then a repeat of the same mantra.

I was advised to get legal advice….

We ventured into the fact that schools are not public property, that under this statute they could indeed ban a father of a child from the premises, I asked at what point a public building had become private property, and to whom?

I therefore request from Peel Park School and also as a separate file from Lynn Brewer, the full account as to when Peel Park School moved from a public body to a private body and also to name the private body in ownership of the public asset which is Peel Park  school buildings and land.

Lynn you again moved into repeat mode, adding you wanted to end the call, I asked under what criteria you Lynn Brewer working as a public servant for LCC could refuse to communicate in an adult fashion with a taxpayer from within Lancashire, again…same old repeat….

I therefore request from Lynn Brewer a full and detailed copy of the legal criteria under which Lynn believes gives her the right to demand I comply with her wishes.

Lynn said she worked for the governors at Peel Park School,

I therefore request the names of each member of Peel Park staff be they governor or not, to which Lynn Brewer and her department has had contact with over this issue.

 

Peel Park School

I have no acknowledgement to the following FOI request sent 18 November 2009 :

 

Under FOI Act 2000

Dear Mrs. Williams.

Could you please confirm which governors at Peel park have undergone the course :

School Governors One Stop Shop

Secondly :

The LEA informed me that it is your remit to present the LEA guidelines thus requested by me relating to the denial to allow me to study the exercise books of my son, they also said you have seven days in which to reply. This second request is thus formalised in writing I await your response.

Regards

sean young

Do the school and its governors feel they are above the FOI Act 2000 and need not reply?

Is your refusal to respond due to the letter sent from Lynn brewer and LCC, or under Contingency-Resilience doctrine?

I therefore request a full and detailed explanation as to your refusal to acknowledge receipt of the above FOI request.

If it is so because of the advise received by Lynn brewer, then please supply the full criteria under which advise from a solicitor stands above the FOI Act 2000

Peel Park have also failed to comply under FOI to a request made on November 2 2009 :

Under FOI Act 2000

 

Dear Mrs. Williams

In light of two previous conversations I have had with you , both occasions in which I required answers to questions posed, I found you to be very deceptive in your manner and extremely evasive in your answers to the point you said a lot without actually answering the questions posed. It is on that basis I feel the only way we can communicate is via freedom of information requests which you are legally obliged to answer.

In light of the first issue and conversation which was in relation to Miss Jones and her suggestion to the mother of my child in Miss Jones class, that she send in the requested medical information I had withheld, her exact words were : would you like to sneak in the information.

This of course presents the idea the school is in the position of getting all the requested information at all costs even against the wishes of the parents, deceptive coercion is the event carried out by your school in the fist instant, I need to know from whence this criteria has its root.

 

On that basis I formerly request :

A full copy of the qualifications of Miss Jones, her employment record and position at your school.

A copy of the action you Mrs. Williams took after I had made you aware of the issue.

Why you failed to respond to my many requests that you call me back given I could not get hold of you myself to further explore the issue at hand.

I request a copy of your rulings in relation to gathering information from parents by any and all means.

I also request a copy of all data you hold on my son, including all data you have accrued via role play lessons, lessons in which you have the children describe their home environment, ie, getting up, tea time and going to bed.

I request a copy of all bodies you the school Peel Park  are mandated to then give out this collected data, be they governmental or private.

Could you please supply a copy of the all staff at your school and their contingency positions as directed via the Lancashire Resilience Forum, including the position in this regard held by you Mrs. Williams.

I request a copy of the school contingency planning document under which you are currently operating, the names of all governors mandated to this planning also.

Could you please supply me with the below details in relation to the school withholding pupils from the parents on Friday 23rd October 2009

Log number : LC/2009 10230796. Who took the call from the police and at what time was the call taken

Who verified the call was indeed from the police

From whom did the call come from and from which station?

What steps where taken to protect the children and parents in the school yard waiting to collect the children inside the school given you were concerned for the safety of the children inside the school, as you made clear in our very brief phone conversation on Monday 2 November 2009, a conversation on which you hung up

On what criteria did you then decide to release the children as you said again in our phone conversation 2 November, 4 minutes after you decided to keep the children inside.

Why did the school communicate only via text message to the parents, and under what criteria was this determined.

Could you supply the minutes of your last seven resilience – Contingency meetings held within your school.

Could you supply a list of all resilience – Contingency meetings you yourself Mrs. Williams have attended since taking the role of head at Peel Park .

 

Fingerprints

Could you please supply me with the legal criteria which determined that you could take my sons fingerprints without any consent his parents.

More to follow.

Best regards

sean young

 

P.S. You can follow the reporting of these events to which you are now fully tied into :

UK  : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School :

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=4128

Developing A School Emergency Response Plan Guidance For Governors And Headteachers :

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=4340

 

Full Contingency Study :

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?page_id=4429

 

Please can you acknowledge receipt of this email as you receive it, thank you.

Therefore I request a copy of the criteria under which Peel Park School is legally allowed to refuse to answer the above FOI request within the allotted 20 day period, or supply the information requested.

Now as I was about to leave this report for the day, upon looking in my email box I found a response from Peel Park School, from Judith. Now considering Mrs. Williams and I are not shall we say on good terms…. I was surprised to see the name Judith that was until on closer inspection I saw the email was not addressed to me but to Lynn Brewer,

 

Quote :

Hi Lynn

Just to let you know I havent replied!

Judith

 

This message was atop the FOI request reminder I made today December 3 2009 :

 

From: Life Inthemix

To: 11006, head

Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 1:10 PM

Subject: Re: FOI request

 

Under FOI Act 2000

Mrs. Williams.

I note you have failed to supply the information requested under FOI to the request made November 2 2009, you are in breach of the act, failure to comply with this request today will leave no choice but to take this matter further.

sean young

 

So what plays out here….?

For a start from the mouth of Lynn Brewer; she works for the governors at Peel Park School, the school is private property.

The situation thus unfolding is the fact we have a public paid solicitor, acting for a private corporate entity…against a taxpayer!

Or I pay for a solicitor to act against me on behalf of a private company or Trust.

Worse is the fact we have a public solicitor acting for a private entity against a parent of a child which by law must attend school, this is preposterous.

I rang Lynn just to let her know I had received an email I did not feel was meant for me, that it made very clear it was she, Lynn Brewer in control of this whole diatribe of a situation, from the outset she just wanted to terminate the conversation, ahh bless….

 


 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually


Further Study

In Profile : Peel Park Foundation School

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response

Now Parents Face Criminal Checks Just To Enter Their Children’s School

 

 


________________________________

______________





Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in E. WE RESPOND, EDUCATION | No Comments »

Peel Park Response Via Lancashire County Council To My Informing The Parents

Posted by admin on 20th November 2009

Everything Changes With This


Wednesday 18 November 2009 I received this through the post :

 

Peel Park

.

peel park

 

 

The issue for all to contemplate here is;

Withholding children from parents ‘V’ My issuing flyers…

Which would appear the most important to you as a parent? Which caused real alarm and distress?

Quick Bullet Points

  • Contacted by the school : A school is not a person, a school cannot contact anyone, for this letter to have authority it has to have named persons.
  • Everything within this letter is based on hearsay, no complainants no legal status.
  • To the best of my knowledge such orders have to be ordered by a court.
  • After 14 years of contact with Peel Park school  as a parent, including Mr Henderson, the school knows who I am.
  • The long telephone conversation was so while I waited for Mrs. Lauder to arrive at the phone to explain why the school will not allow my son to bring home his exercise books, this has still to be resolved.
  • The letter is a prime example of Neuro Linguistic Programming and Reverse Psychology.

 

Detailed Study

I have to say everything in my mind changes with this letter, Mrs Williams in presenting the idea I was in any way aggressive and that I had to be reminded of such is to be frank, the biggest fabrication I have had laid against me in quite a while.

I can and do say with hand on my heart that as I gave out those flyers, they were gratefully received,  those whom I did speak with beyond asking if I could give them the flyer, all said they did not like the feeling they  had when the school sent out the text message to explain the school was not going to release the children from school and thanked me for the information.

If any parent in any way felt intimidated, I for one did not witness it, yet I can well understand they had a shock when they  grasped the  presented  summary and the link to the evidence explaining why I felt it important they knew about this so far unreported side to the school withholding all children in the school  October  23 2009.

Point I : If the event of the 23rd was the innocent Health & Safety precaution as the school claims, why leave the babies, toddlers and pregnant parents in the yard? We are speaking in terms of total contradiction, here, this event was nothing to do with health and safety.

Point 2 : If the event was as they claim why are the school so angry at my ‘educating’ parents to the fact the event itself looks very dubious?

Point 3 : From around 6pm on the 10th, calls came in…. I was very pleased with the response from parents as concerned as I over the idea the school can prevent parents collecting their children, because it just does not add up and is a major overstepping of the  boundary between family and state.  Also the website received an enormous amount of visits from before 4pm , so I refute the idea any parent was intimidated by me personally, but the realisation of what actually took place on October 23…. I accept as a possibility

Why would the school fabricate the whole discussion by claiming it heated up, in fact it was I who on occasion interjected to suggest Mrs. Williams not get excited as I was trying to help the teachers by getting parents to support them in their right to say no to implementing corporate advice, I am very upset at this fabrication, as parents we cannot allow such behavior to go unchecked.

Why the attack in this letter to me personally for doing what the head is mandated to carry out , the sharing of information?

 

Dissecting the letter from a contingency angle :

Quote :

‘Please note’

Please note, is not the way one begins a legal document.

Quote :

I have been contacted by the above  school specifically with regard to ‘your’ behavior

This is perhaps one of the most important points for you to grasp, it is everywhere in our system, please if nothing else try to understand this next piece of information.

There is absolutely no  mention of the points I have expressed to Mrs. Williams relating to the October event, nothing about the schools refusal to allow my son bring home his exercise books, nor any mention of the information requested under FOI, in fact absolutely no mention of the schools behaviour nor any attempt to work with me to ascertain the real meaning to the October event, the real issue sidelined…..  they make it all about me.

This is Neuro Linguistic Programming in action, and I am pretty sure many of you have felt exactly this type of reverse psychology used against you from  aspects of the system. This is the very psychological system people are trained under, and to use, in the many courses they attend, some become very good at this and become known as programmers, most just slowly begin to see things in the reversed position and except it as it comes down the chain of command. Common Purpose is a big user and programmer in this regard, and most important; Common Purpose are training leaders.

Quote :

‘I am advised you came to the school on the afternoon of the 9th November’

Very interesting , I hand delivered the flyers on Tuesday 10 November, this letter has been thrown together, and so far doing a very good job of being based in fantasy, and making the whole saga about me and my behaviour.

Quote :

‘With the sole purpose of distributing leaflets amongst parents ‘Designed’ [keyword] to cause ‘alarm’ and ‘distress’.

Yet another example of NLP, they use emotions already in the mix; ‘alarm…distress’, they then reverse the emotions and project it onto whomever is their target, in this case me. Yes parents were alarmed and distressed at the text message from Peel Park which said parents could not have the children, but the NLP move is to focus thus reversing those very emotions upon me as cause, destroy the messenger…hide the message.

Quote :

‘When approached by a member of staff who challenged you on the basis you were not known to the school, you refused to identify yourself or cease to hand out the leaflets’….

WoW with a capitol W, the teacher who  came out as I almost completed the leaflet hand out, to the point I had only three left,  was  a male member of staff who began;  ’Mr Young can I ask what you are doing!

Mmm, not sure how not being known comes into this one…14 years a parent to children at Peel Park…. disgusting behaviour from Peel Park’s Head, and it would seem Mr. Henderson. I did stop for Mr Henderson but one has to understand I heard his voice and at the time people were coming to me for the leaflet, so I did not respond immediately, but did so after only 10 seconds or thereabouts, I asked his name just to officiate the exchange  he told me and  again asked what I was doing again by name,  I said it was as I had previously explained to Mrs. Williams, the point at which the parents received what I had found in relation to the October event, which is contrary to that offered by all concerned, there was a point of break for around five seconds as the final two leaflets were handed to parents who approached me for a leaflet, but we resumed conversation immediately.

Quote :

‘Such behaviour on your part is wholly unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the school or LEA’.

Well, considering I did not act in the way described by this letter  they must be speaking of someone else.

Quote :

‘I am therefore writing to formerly inform you that with immediate effect, you are no longer permitted to come onto the premises of the school. This prohibition will continue until further notice’.

This letter is relating to someone who acted in an ill fashioned manner, it certainly was not I therefore the letter has no validity in relation to me.

The trouble we face here is the fact what has been written in the above letter is pretty standard practice when dealing with the civil service, Mrs. Williams used the very same when we spoke on the telephone, when they do not like the questioning, they claim they do not like the tone of the call and end the call. Are we to allow this childish behaviour to continue given the stakes, which boils down to the schools taking a controlling role in the lives of our families, if you stand up to them, they spit out the dummy and you get landed with a letter of complete fabrication, twisting the whole event round to focus not on the issue at hand, but they turn it into a charade all about you….reverse psychology, Neuro Linguistic Programming in the hotseat. The TV uses it in all the soap operas, the adds, the news…is it any wonder the majority have missed this deceptive tweak to the way we all think.

It has effected people to the point they have taken the programming from the TV, which then allows letters such as the one above to have power in our democracy. slowly but surely the majority get the feeling something is not right, yet allow it to continue, we must cease in thinking this way. Serious things are going on in the background, just out of range, but when one takes an event like this and presents it in the way I have, you can see the play, the question you all need to contemplate is why? Because rest assured, this October 23 event was absolutely nothing of the sort as reported by all concerned, it was a drill to see if they had their contingency networks in place, but most importantly of all, they are testing your reactions, testing to see how far they can take power of attorney over your children, see it, I need your help, why not we parents get together and discuss the whole saga, it could be the very catalyst required to change the school criteria.

The letter then reals off orders as though I am some kind of criminal, and the school is an authority, this is insanity.

The second page to the letter  does all it can to control the way I communicate with the school, but most importantly in this case, an attempt to ensure you the parents do not see the information which contradicts the ‘official story’ as presented by the school, fire, police, and indeed the Lancashire Telegraph. They do not wish that you the parents ever find out the truth relating to the phone conversations already had by myself and Mrs. Williams, conversations which this letter is doing all it can to prevent further such communication in the future. The conversations are actually on site to view, and show there was never any aggression, to be so would defeat the whole object of this work, although Mrs. O Donnell was rather heightened not surprisingly of course if the poor lady had been the one answering the many calls she said the school had received on the 23 October.

They also do not wish normal teachers to hear what the whole issue is really about…especially from me, and make a point of fact to stop any such contact happening again. This was required because it had to be a teacher reply to my request to see and study at home my sons exercise books, I did not make the rule they did, now they use it as a yet more insult against me, this is an example of contingency planning doctrine with the mantra; ‘slow time thinking into quick time doing’, this letter has been created on the fly to test this as a valid response.

The school and the LEA have attempted to remove a massive part of my work with this letter, they have tried to demolish my means of communication with anyone outside the resilience network. This is how they stop any form of people power when it comes to learning what goes on in the civil service, it will be successful if parents do not see this game and begin to express their distaste.

 

 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually


Further Study

In Profile : Peel Park Foundation School

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response

In Profile : Healthy Schools

In Profile : Moodle The Virtual Environment

In Profile : Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)

In Profile : Accrington & Rossendale College

How Education Changed

 

Request Denied By Peel Park To Allow My Son To Bring Home Exercise Books

Schools Taking More Power : Bickering Parents To Get State Therapy

Obama Pushing Child Porn In Schools

DEMOS : Think Tank: National Service For 7-Year-Olds

 

 

__________________________________

_______________

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in D. P.P RESPOND, EDUCATION | No Comments »

Update Peel Park School : Informing Parents Of The Hidden Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Posted by admin on 11th November 2009

Gave Parents At The School The Other Side To The 23 October Withholding Event


peel park

 

 

Tuesday 10 November 2009 brief summary of this story so far :

After my conversation with Mrs Williams the head at Peel Park bearing no fruit, due to the fact all head teachers are trained to answer all questions in a certain manner, I made the contact official with the presentation of Freedom Of Information requests. I also explained to Mrs Williams  the fact parents did not seem too excited at the school deciding to withhold all children while leaving  pregnant mothers and babies waiting in the school yard, was due to the fact  they had only one half of the story, and that this position would change.

This afternoon Nov 10th,  I presented waiting parents with a leaflet with a brief explanation and with the URL address of the page on which I have recorded the whole event, which should suffice as far as offering parents the other side to the October 23 2009 event.

The leaflet was brief and to the point :

 

URGENT NOTICE FOR ALL PARENTS
Phone : 07976 653910

As you know Friday 23 October the school withheld our children presenting the idea it was for their safety, the truth however is far from this reality. I made immediate inquiries into the event, to say things do not add up is an understatement, they did not add up in the schools response nor the Fire Services record of the event. Mrs Williams the school head was very deceptive in her answers, rather frightened, and in the end I had no choice but to formalise the issue with Freedom of Information requests. I also found the same when I confronted the Fire Service and the Lancashire Resilience Forum which governs the countries contingency criteria.
Many of you may have received the last release of leaflets regarding the swine flu agenda, if so this is a continuation of that action but with very serious consequences if we the parents do not awaken to what is being practiced at Peel Park with our children, we need to work together to get to the bottom of what is really going on in our schools, see phone number at the top of the page, after you look at the full report at the link below :

UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=4128

As parents we need answers, together we can get them.


I gave out over 150 leaflets without any issue whatever, as I was completing the hand out I was approached by Mr Henderson, he asked what this was about, I explained it was the point at which the parents received the opportunity to see the other side to the October event, as explained to Mrs. Williams that the parents could now follow the response from the bodies involved.

Mrs Williams arrived and rather interesting there was something else seemed to creep into the conversations, what it was is known as neural linguistic programming, the very system all the courses our civil service have been forced to attend,  all use this psychological programming as standard. From this point on everything that came from either Mr Henderson or Mrs Williams became a diversion, and offering possible scenarios as to what I personally was doing. I asked they cease in using this programme as this was the reason we had reached this point, that I wanted answers as a parent and a taxpayer… answers I was unable to achieve from the people so far involved in the drill.

Mrs. Williams on several occasions was apt to tell me I had not gone via the normal procedures for complaints, that I should approach the school governors, to which I replied I was fully aware of this fact but  given the governors and heads are those trained in the contingency criteria, I would  not receive the information needed to fully understand the real purpose of the 23 October event, that to actually get information from the civil service I found my way gets results, and does not fall foul of the very well rehearsed responses one receives from all aspects of our system, teachers included.

The problem we seem to have is in the fact the civil service and indeed in education as a whole, they are speaking the same language, it is a language that politely but firmly tells you nothing and tries to have you feel strange for even bringing up the issue. I want to help the teaching staff gain a little backbone to say the word no relating to the changes they are forced to implement within the schools, the only way for this to materialise is for parents in full knowledge of what is  going on presently, and that such criteria is set to expand within the  schools in the future, that we parents make it very clear we support them in standing and ensuring our children are afforded the kind of education that actually teaches them about their heritage and a morality that we older generations heeded on a personal level and created Great Britain as a society from it.

The whole ethos of the term ‘curriculum has become something no parent would recognise as anything resembling the  education of facts, it has become scenario based and the children then drilled and drilled to see the same script as the scenario represents in the eyes of the education elite, absolutely the end to any imagination and difference of opinions.

The schools presently are going ballistic about how important it is the children become whistle-blowers in their nieghbourhood and at home. Many of the school lessons in the primaries are gathering information about the family unit, they have the children describe getting up in the morning, tea time and bedtime. They are profiling families, collecting the data, then sharing the information with the government.

Within the FOI request made, I specifically request a full copy of all data held on my child, because reports from my many colleagues who are working within the schools system say quite clearly, the schools hold copious amounts of information on our children and family. The main point of concern in this regard is the proposed new ‘Home School Agreement‘, to sign this agreement positions your family at the mercy of any teacher who determines your child to be disruptive, to fail on the homework, and timekeeping issues, enacting a move by the state under which the whole family will get social workers in the home, parents on courses run by psychologists, who will then determine if you are fit to have your children back…but perhaps by far the most intrusive, to keep a track on the family as the state moves in, you will be forced to have CCTV in your home. I suggest you consider making a similar request for the data held.

We have to fight the very system which demands the Head, Governors and thus the  teachers, act in the way they are currently; which is in direct contradiction to our democratically determined curriculum, or…the one we all  take for granted is being taught, because this is not the case at all.  What we have is a situation whereby all leaders inside of our civil services and politic are acting  under a completely different structure, namely under ‘Contingency‘. If we support the teachers they must then act on our behalf, because it is we the parents who determine the morality and content of education  our children receive, it certainly is not the role of the private corporations to decide our education criteria, but under the Contingency Act system, this is exactly the state of play we are quite obviously suffering, carried through by the headteachers and the governors. So to go through the correct procedure as Mrs Williams suggested, would bring zero results.

I tried on several occasions during the conversation with Mr. Henderson and Mrs. Williams to present the fact I wished to reach enough parents  so we could give support to the teachers to say no to so much of what is changing in our schools. I also suggested they are not teaching our children in the way the parents took for granted and that these changes had been implemented by the teaching staff who have also kept everything secret from the parents, also they are protecting the system over and above the parents and children…. this will not do.

Mrs Williams did feel what I had written on the leaflet was defamatory; I disagree and say it is accurate.

We ended the conversation without any agreement or compromise, as I reiterated the fact we shall let this enter the minds of the parents and see were it moves from there.

After six pm, the phone began to ring, so far every inquiry has been very agreeable.


Wednesday 11 November 2009

I received  a third text message from Peel Park requesting parents visit the sunshine room, yesterday it was for the centenary meeting. It would seem the Contingency drill is ongoing  to see if they can mass communicate with the parents via text message, and have them all come running to the school. Its like electronic tagging!


 

 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually


Further Study

In Profile : Peel Park Foundation School

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response

Request Denied By Peel Park To Allow My Son To Bring Home Exercise Books



______________________________________

_____________________

 

 

 


Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in C. THE PARENTS, EDUCATION | No Comments »

Update : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

Posted by admin on 3rd November 2009

Having Had To Wait A Week To Contact The School Due To Half Term….


peel park



Today is November 2 2009, having had to wait a week until the schools returned after half term, I rang Peel Park primary the school one of my children attends which on the 23rd October 2009 sent me a text message which said they would be holding the children inside the school due to a chemical spillage.


Just to recap :

3.24 pm text received :

I rang the school and was surprised to get through. I spoke with a Mrs O’Donnell who informed me she was the office manager. I said I had received a message to the effect they were holding my son in school on the dictate of the police.

Mrs O Donnell said the children had been ‘released (my god they are even speaking military) five minutes ago, I then asked at what time did they receive the call, she said it was three minutes before school ended.

I asked to clarify that the school had held the children on one phone call from the police; she replied that was the case.

I then asked which police station the call came from, Mrs O’Donnell replied she did not know which station the call came from.

I then asked had the school checked the validity of the source call; Mrs O’Donnell became very angry at my questioning, and said she had not taken the call, that the school did not even know were the overturned wagon was in relation to the school save the fact it was on Burnley Road, Accrington.

I asked why she was getting so angry given as a parent I was concerned that the school is happy to go along with the dictate of the police, especially so given the vaccination agenda, I suggested she calm down as I was merely asking questions I had every right to have answered.

Mrs O’Donnell did calm down, and I will say the impression I had was that the school staff were as disgusted as most parents at the fact they had to comply with this police drill in dictating to schools. I told Mrs O’Donnell this was a drill, she was more than happy to listen, so there is hope yet that teachers whom we the people pay to teach only, are about to get very upset at such state interference in the school mandate.

Full Story


I rang first on the morning of November 2 and and spoke with Lorraine from the office staff, I asked to speak with Mrs. Williams the school head.


I was told she would be in meetings until lunch time, I requested a call back and left my details.

I received a call from Mrs. Williams at 11:43 am, I began by asking why she had not called me back over the incident whereby Miss Jones my sons teacher, had asked my sons mother if she would like to ‘sneak in’ the medical information the school had requested, to which I had declined to offer, and asked Mrs. Williams for further information which had not been forthcoming.

Mrs. Williams replied that she had spoken to Miss Jones and Miss Jones had refuted the accusation. I replied that my son had heard the conversation and was the very chap who had informed me of the matter in the first instant, and asked if she was claiming both my son and ex wife were in fact lying, I received no response.

I then moved into the October 23rd event whereby the school had decided to withhold the children in school due to a call from the police, I asked had the call been verified before they determined their course of action, Mrs. Williams replied they had, that they had a log of the call, but failed to reply to the fact asked, had the call been verified.


I asked for the log data to which she replied she had thrown it away last night…very dubious to say the least.

Mrs. Williams then proceeded to ramble on about the fact that Peel Park was a good school and that if I did not like the school why did I keep my son at the school? I reminded her that the law states I have too, to which she replied; you can home school. Interestingly I received a similar response from Accrington Academy when I was asking for information, it seems to be a very well trained response from all people within the Civil Service, first to take you off topic, then to try and get your child to leave the school.


What are they hiding, why do they not feel they have to speak to parents and answer questions?

I then asked Mrs.Williams under what criteria did the school think to withhold the children from the parents, she replied that the police rang and spoke of a chemical leak on Burnley road and told the school office to keep the children inside because they did not know what they were dealing with. I asked under what criteria did the school act, she replied under Health & Safety, to which I replied and what of the health and safety of the parents and children in the playground waiting to pick up the children she was not releasing.

Mrs Williams was by this point  getting very upset with my questioning and began again to move off track, asking why I was doing this when in her mind everything was according to Health and Safety, so I explained myself.

I then suggested the problem in fact was the fact the schools seemed to more concerned with Health & Safety over the education of the children and that this was the main issue, Mrs. Williams kept explaining how busy she was looking after the welfare of the children, to which I replied again, would seem to be taking precedent over the education, and I wanted to know why this was the case.

I then as an example asked who had given the school permission to fingerprint my child, given the police need to charge a person before they can achieve this, I have to say she was rather perplexed by this and said she did not think she needed permission, that it was only for the library. I again asked on what criteria she believed this to be so….no answer.

At this point I could see I was getting nowhere, and told Mrs. Williams I would have no choice but to officiate the situation with a FOI request, as it was clear she had no intention of answering my questions. Mrs. Williams then told me no other parents were bothered by the situation, I reminded her they only had one version of events, but that would change soon enough. Mrs Williams then pulled out of the bag yet another civil servant spin and decided she did not like the tone of the conversation and said she was terminating the call, and hung up.

Clearly from the above conversation we can see that teachers have been coerced into acting like politician’s, they are evasive, they have specific directives in how to shift a conversation off the original topic. This is the result of many courses they are made to attend, courses using Neural Linguistic Programming, this is not a good situation by any means.

The Civil Service as a whole has become politicized, they no longer have to be as they were trained, they have left that behind and become what seems to be very frightened people operating a totally different system to that which the British people still believe is their mandate. This is the result of the Contingency Act 2004, which since its coming into being has been the only criteria under which our whole Civil Service has been forced to take up at the direct command of the Civil Contingency Secretariat. This goes against our constitutional doctrines on all levels, because so much of this doctrine comes from the United Nations and the EU, both of which are foreign bodies, something Common Law strictly forbids. common law also forbids at all costs, a Foundation operating within our system such as this :

In Profile : VectorCommand


Albeit in ignorance, what we have is the situation whereby all our democratically elected representatives, our very well paid Civil Servants, are all acting treason according to Common Law. I am fully aware they do not know this fact, but fact it is.  The fact I have learned this to be so, to do nothing would leave me in the position whereby I also acted treason, because to know treason is being carried out and to do nothing,  would places me in the position of  Misprisien of Treason, and just as guilty as the others.

This is not a position to which I would be happy to operate, therefore I have no alternative but to do all I can to awaken my fellow countrymen to the reality under which we are all presently operating. Although I loathe to put people such as Mrs. Williams in the spotlight, it is the best avenue I can find in bringing to the attention of the parents, that which has changed our schools beyond recognition, while the teachers have been happy to keep this secret from the very people who pay their wages, and place our children in their care for five days of the week.


I sent this FOI request after the conversation was ended by Mrs. Williams :

Under FOI Act 2000

Dear Mrs. Williams

In light of two previous conversations I have had with you , both occasions in which I required answers to questions posed, I found you to be very deceptive in your manner and extremely evasive in your answers to the point you said a lot without actually answering the questions posed. It is on that basis I feel the only way we can communicate is via freedom of information requests which you are legally obliged to answer.

In light of the first issue and conversation which was in relation to Miss Jones and her suggestion to the mother of my child in Miss Jones class, that she send in the requested medical information I had withheld, her exact words were : would you like to sneak in the information.

This of course presents the idea the school is in the position of getting all the requested information at all costs even against the wishes of the parents, deceptive coercion is the event carried out by your school in the fist instant, I need to know from whence this criteria has its root.

On that basis I formerly request :

A full copy of the qualifications of Miss Jones, her employment record and position at your school.

A copy of the action you Mrs. Williams took after I had made you aware of the issue.

Why you failed to respond to my many requests that you call me back given I could not get hold of you myself to further explore the issue at hand.

I request a copy of your rulings in relation to gathering information from parents by any and all means.

I also request a copy of all data you hold on my son, including all data you have accrued via role play lessons, lessons in which you have the children describe their home environment, ie, getting up, tea time and going to bed.

I request a copy of all bodies you the school Peel Park are mandated to then give out this collected data, be they governmental or private.

Could you please supply a copy of the all staff at your school and their contingency positions as directed via the Lancashire Resilience Forum, including the position in this regard held by you Mrs. Williams.

I request a copy of the school contingency planning document under which you are currently operating, the names of all governors mandated to this planning also.

Could you please supply me with the below details in relation to the school withholding pupils from the parents on Friday 23rd October 2009 :

Log number : LC/2009 10230796. Who took the call from the police and at what time was the call taken

Who verified the call was indeed from the police

From whom did the call come from and from which station

What steps where taken to protect the children and parents in the school yard waiting to collect the children inside the school given you were concerned for the safety of the children inside the school, as you made clear in our very brief phone conversation on Monday 2 November 2009, a conversation on which you hung up

On what criteria did you then decide to release the children as you said again in our phone conversation 2 November, 4 minutes after you decided to keep the children inside.

Why did the school communicate only via text message to the parents, and under what criteria was this determined.

Could you supply the minutes of your last seven resilience – Contingency meetings held within your school.

Could you supply a list of all resilience – Contingency meetings you yourself Mrs. Williams have attended since taking the role of head at Peel Park.

 

Fingerprints.

Could you please supply me with the legal criteria which determined that you could take my sons fingerprints without any consent his parents.

More to follow.

Best regards

 

P.S. You can follow the reporting of these events to which you are now fully tied into :

UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School :

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=4128

Developing A School Emergency Response Plan Guidance For Governors And Headteachers :

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?p=4340

Full Contingency Study :

http://www.lifeinthemixtalk.com/?page_id=4429

Please can you acknowledge receipt of this email as you receive it, thank you.


This is how our schools behave in 2009. They are not going to change this behaviour on their own, we the people need to demand the schools return to the role of teaching, and cease in acting politic of the worst kind, and worse, they must cease in this idea that they are somehow in charge of our children over and above the parents. They call it child welfare, I call it child abuse sanctioned by the state.

 

 

 

 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually


Further Study

In Profile : Peel Park Foundation School

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response

Homosexuals brainwashing our children in elementary schools



_____________________________

_______________


Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in B. OUR ACTION, EDUCATION | 2 Comments »

UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School ?

Posted by admin on 23rd October 2009

3.24pm 23 October 2009 : I Received A Text Message From Peel Park Primary School Accrington To Say My Child Will Not Be Released From School Due To A Overturned Lorry….Chemical Hazard


Updates To This Story At The End Of This Report


1470593_0edb1a1d

Peel Park Primary Accrington. Click image to enlarge


3.24 pm Friday 23 October 2009 Text Received : We Are Withholding Your Child In School

I rang the school and was surprised to get through. I spoke with a Mrs O’Donnell who informed me she was the office manager. I said I had received a message to the effect they were holding my son in school on the dictate of the police.

Mrs O’Donnell said the children had been ‘released’ (my god they are even speaking military) five minutes ago, I then asked at what time did they receive the call, she said it was three minutes before school ended.

I asked to clarify that the school had held the children on one phone call from the police; she replied that was the case.

I then asked which police station the call came from, Mrs O’Donnell replied she did not know which station the call came from.

I then asked had the school checked the validity of the source call; Mrs O’Donnell became very angry at my questioning, and said she had not taken the call, that the school did not even know were the overturned wagon was in relation to the school save the fact it was on Burnley Road, Accrington.

I asked why she was getting so angry given as a parent I was concerned that the school is happy to go along with the dictate of the police, especially so given the vaccination agenda, I suggested she calm down as I was merely asking questions I had every right to have answered.

Mrs O’Donnell did calm down, and I will say the impression I had was that the school staff were as disgusted as most parents at the fact they had to comply with this police drill in dictating to schools. I told Mrs O’Donnell this was a drill, she was more than happy to listen, so there is hope yet that teachers whom we the people pay to teach only, are about to get very upset at such state interference in the school mandate.

 

Points of focus :

Three minutes before school ends on the last day of term is highly suspicious, and more, the accident took place at 2:40 pm which is 37 minutes after the event,the school has one full week for parents to forget and to wait before any further contact with the school can take place

Was it just one school receiving the warning

Why would the school not verify such an important call, yet act on it

Why did the office manager get angry

Were other people in the school area given any form of warning


Update :

After speaking with a parent who was in the school yard as the event took place, he said The school doors were shut and the school communicated with parents via text message.

I find it very strange that the school was told to keep the children inside while all the parents stood in the yard with toddlers and babies, many parents are also pregnant, this is not what normal sound humans would do, they would have took in all parents and children from the yard into the school


Lancashire Telegraph reports the incident :


Homes Evacuated After Chemical Leak In Huncoat

Note : In Brackets My Input

By Neil Docking

FORTY FIVE homes were evacuated and a major road closed as firefighters tackled a potentially dangerous chemical spillage.

Accrington, Burnley and Padiham fire crews used specialist hazardous material, or hazmat, units to clean up the Xylene spillage off Burnley Road, Huncoat, this afternoon.

The road was closed for more than three hours and residents were moved to Hyndburn Sports Centre, Henry Street, as a precaution as firefighters were initially unsure what chemical they were dealing with. [Why did they not know what they were dealing with, the driver is ADR trained, therefore he knew what he was carrying]

Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service said six small drums, from the truck belonging to Clark Transport and Distribution Ltd, had leaked form the lorry near to the Texaco garage.

Xylene is widely used in many products such as paints, glues, and pesticides.

It can cause headaches, dizziness, drowsiness and nausea.

Watch manager Gary Hargreaves, who oversaw the whole operation which began at 2.30pm, set up a 200 metre exclusion zone when firefighters arrived.

Chemical absorbent pads and clay mats, were used to clean up the leak and the leaking drums were sealed. Firefighters had dealt with the spillage by 6pm.

Albert Timberlake, Emergency Response Group team leader, said his team had set up a processing room at the sports centre to register the evacuees and get them checked by British Red Cross and council staff.

Kalpana Sharma, 66, and her husband Dr Dhaneshwar Sharma, 76, of Woodside Close, took refuge in the centre.

When she was told to leave her home Mrs Sharma was quick to make sure she also brought her two cats, Bono and Edge, named by her son Neil, 29.

She said : “We just heard lots of sirens, but we didn’t know what it was because there was so much activity on the road

“A friend called and said don’t do down there, but I wanted to have a look like a nosey parker.

“But police came to the door and said you have to evacuate.

“I asked ‘what about my cats’ and they said ‘we don’t know, we’re not vets’ so I just brought Bono and Edge with me.”

Jane Haigh, 48, of Sutton Crescent, attended the centre with her mum, Patricia Haigh.

The computer systems worker said : “They took our details and checked our medical history when we got to the centre and asked if we needed anything.

“I just wanted to sleep – I started work at six and finished at four.”

Gail Hoole, 61, was evacuated along with her neighbour Alice Riley, 87, of Woodside Road.

Mrs Hoole said : “They gave me 10 minutes to get out and I just thought ‘what about Alice?’

“She asked if she could stay but the policeman said he couldn’t let her stop in because she was so near to it her house could blow up. I thought he was joking but he said ‘no, really’.”

Mrs Riley said : “He helped me get my shoes on and helped me into the car. He was a grand lad. I wasn’t worried because I didn’t have the chance to think.“

The incident caused tailbacks on surrounding roads, including junction 8 of the M56.

See Original Report

End of Telegraph Report

Points of focus :

The transport company; Clark Transport and Distribution Ltd, is a very large company with an annual turnover of 20-50 million. Specialising in all chemical and dangerous substance transportation, and is also listed as a choice company for the pharmaceutical companies.

It is a family run company with its head office  situated at Station Road, Oldbury, West Midlands, with depots at :

Bridgend

Glasgow

Manchester

Southampton

Wakefield

Company Website


Why would the Red Cross be on tap in Hyndburn Sports Centre, a private establishment at that?

Why would this establishment be the chosen point for evacuees?

This tale is beginning to look like a Third World TV news script playing out, in Britain, with people being ‘processed’, medical background checked…. all on the back of six small drums leaking.


LIH_logo-145x101

Hyndburn Sports Centre is controlled by guess what…a Charitable Trust called :

Leisure-In-Hyndburn.

The Trust comes up on Hyndburn Councils website, and manages the grouping of leisure centres coming under the umbrella of Leisure in Hyndburn.

 

The incident report on the Fire Stations website :

Incident
Spillage of chemical from lorry drums

23rd October 2009, 2:30pm
Incident number: 2232
Number of appliances: 3 plus specials
Address:
Burnley Road,
Accrington.


Spillage of chemical from 6 small drums on lorry. 200 metre exclusion zone set up, properties within zone evacuated.

2 personnel in chemical protection suits committed to exclusion zone to assess spillage.

Further crews being committed to exclusion zone wearing breathing apparatus. Chemical absorbant pads, clay mats, 4 breathing apparatus in use.

All contaminated equipment and leaking drums now sealed. Triple extension ladder and decontamination pack in use.


I sent this FOI request to Lancashire Fire Service :

Under FOI Act 2000
Dear sir.
In relation to the chemical spillage Burnley Road Huncoat on October 23 2009, could you please provide the following information :

Why and who determined Hyndburn Sports Centre as a centre for the evacuated persons.

From which Red Cross base did the Red Cross staff on scene at Hyndburn Sports Centre have their origin.

Why three minutes before school ended was Peel Park primary ordered to hold the children in school when the school is clearly half a mile away from the accident scene.

Could you supply the full cv for Gary Hargreaves and a fuller account of his power in this type of scenario and as he played out that power in todays event.

Could you confirm or not the role played , if any, by any Capita Symonds personnel directly or indirectly.

Best regards


Point of focus :

If we look at the website of Clark Transport we find this very well documented criteria relating to the expertise of all their drivers :

Hazardous

Clarke Transport has specialised in transporting hazardous goods for many years, which is why you can rely on us to deliver your freight safely, efficiently and on time.

Our many satisfied customers include some of the world’s leading manufacturers of paints, resins and chemicals – proof of our first-class reputation.  Our new Gold Service, Clarke Chemical Coatings Express, gives you an added level of reassurance, and is the latest development in our constant quest for innovation and improvement.

The expertise we offer includes bespoke solutions for HCDG (High Consequence Dangerous Goods), and we’re national leaders in the movement of hazardous groupage consignments. But don’t just take our word for it – our services have been independently audited and approved by many major chemical manufacturers, as well as major worldwide logistics and supply-chain service providers.

You can rest assured that each and every consignment of hazardous freight will always be handled and delivered by our fully ADR-approved warehouse and delivery team. And here are a few more impressive features of our service :

In house DGSA

All vehicles fully ADR compliant

All drivers ADR accredited

Accredited to BSIS09001/2000

Drivers trained in pump discharge operations, equipped with necessary PPE

All drivers are ADR accredited and are specialised’ in the transportation of hazardous goods.

Now look at this firefighter response as given to the Lancashire Telegraph :


The road was closed for more than three hours and residents were moved to Hyndburn Sports Centre, Henry Street, as a precaution as fire-fighters were initially unsure what chemical they were dealing with, this is either untrue or Gary Hargreaves and the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident are inadequate under Health & Safety.

I ask for the cv of Gary Hargreaves because it is not a viable excuse that they did not know what chemical they were dealing with, they only needed to ask the ADR accredited driver. So no need to shut down the M56, nor the need for fire service units outside of Accrington, and certainly no need to hold the children in school while allowing all parents access into the supposed extended danger zone, over half a mile away from the accident scene.

This i a Private Corporate drill, dictated by Capita Symmonds-Serco with the police dictating to the Resilience Forum team to see what reaction they would get from the people, the press, and the general public forced to be evacuated.

This is not the normal type of emergency action taken by our democratic systems, it is the corporate dictate which in Hyndburn’s case is looking like Capita Symonds playing fascist shutdown of the system.

The real point of focus is to the fact all our civil services which we pay for, are taking their orders from the private world of corporate  business, which according to Benito Mussolini when asked to determine fascism said :

“When the corporate world has full control of a nations political system, you have fascism in place”.

Fascism is not our system unless you the people do nothing, because what this investigation shows very clearly… is the fact the whole civil service and security service are happy to act out this drill and worse keep the fact a total secret from we the taxpayers.



The Red Cross

The Red Cross is an  interesting organisation, it has a royal charter and also operates with AECOM, one of the largest military corporations on the globe.

The Red Cross also  gave out a surprising award to a very well known mercenary group, Blackwater :

Jeremy Scahill author of the best-selling book Blackwater, notes that “Blackwater Worldwide, the Bush administration’s favourite mercenary company, is no stranger to blood — its operatives have caused a lot of it to be spilled in Iraq. … This week, the company received an award from the American Red Cross … for Blackwater’s recent blood drive, where company employees reportedly gave 264 units of blood.

‘That means that well over 600 lives have been saved in this region,’ said Georgia Donaldson of the Mid Atlantic region Red Cross. The group presented Blackwater’s owner, Erik Prince with a plaque honouring the company. … This isn’t the first time Blackwater and the Red Cross teamed up. After Hurricane Katrina, where Blackwater raked in over $70 million in federal ‘security’ contracts, the company held a Red Cross fund-raiser and pulled in $138,000 — about $100,000 short of Blackwater’s estimated daily take at the height of its Katrina operations. The keynote speaker at that event? L. Paul Bremer, the original head of the US occupation.”.

Here is the Red Cross Acting as concentration camp guards

The Red Cross as an example of how something with a supposed positive aim, can end up working for the very opposite of its doctrine, we are left with who and why.

Aims of this action

The point I wish to portray with this work, is not to attack the teachers and other people involved in these events, they have been forced into situations whereby they shift from their mandated roles within our system to something very different, so different it has changed the whole basis of our country. You all know things are not right you can feel it, sense it, and these feelings will not go away. I began to understood this change to our country what seems to be a long time ago now, and like you the initial response is to put it to one side were you do not have to contemplate the reality, but unlike most I looked into the eyes of my children and instinctively knew what my generation and those older  had to do if we were to prevent the younger generations suffering beyond  comprehension in the future, so I decided to look into the reality behind the smokescreen.

What I am trying to achieve today is to present what I have learned to the people that matter; ‘You’, so we can peacefully create the energy that the teachers, councillors, MP’s and all levels of our domestic system need…the ability to say ‘no’ to the will of a very negative intended group of people, the very people drilling, teaching, and then  forced to act contrary to our democratic system as mandated by the voting population, forced  to implement a particular system, dictated via two ‘foreign’,….and I might add in direct opposition to our common law constitution which prevents any outside interference in our governance…. our civil service and politic are being forced to act contrary to their roles and are bringing in the full Contingency Act 2004 as a system overriding our democracy.

An ACT is not a law

Our system needs our support, which means the teachers, MP’s and all our civil service need to know that we the people of Great Britain are behind them 100%, that they must stop the Contingency system fully implementing with immediate effect.

How we got there : Democracy To Contingency

School Resilience Planning

UK School Holds Five Year Old In Isolation After Branding Him A Racist


Five Year Old Isolated In School In Surrey

Yet more proof that the schools are drilling to further their grip on our children on behalf of the state, we have a story in which a five year old called his friend; ‘bin Laden’, The school isolated the five year old called the parents of both parties demanding they come to the school immediately. When they arrived police were also there and made out that a five year old falling out with a friend was a very serious offence, so much so, the parents were kept separate from their children and refused access. Here is the full story :

UK School Holds Five Year Old In Isolation After Branding Him A Racist

Further Issues Relating To This Story :

UK : All Schoolchildren May Be Vaccinated Against Swine Flu

Creating Panic To Force Vaccinations

Planned Biological Attack To Force vaccinations Exposed In August

Doctors Plan Mass Swine Flu Jabs For Under-18s

Panic In Ukraine As Planes Spray The Cities : Chemtrails Spreading Disease

Nanotechnology : What Is In The Swine Flu Vaccine

The Goal of Every H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine : Immunotoxicity, Neurotoxicity And Sterility

UK Mass Death Planning : The Whole Country Is To Become A Concentration Camp

Gary Null Exposes NWO Big Pharma And Their Deadly Vaccines

WHO Memos 1972 Explains How To Turn Vaccines Into A Means Of Killing

America And UK : Judge Confirms Military And Police To Be KILLED In The Depopulation Program Using H1N1 Flu Vaccine


Steps To take Now :

Vaccination Letter To Present To Schools Against Vaccinating Your Child

Letter To Give Your Child To Carry At School And To Reply if You Receive A Vaccination Summons


This video gives insight detailing who controls all the news you see via the mainstream :


Clearly one can see to what extent the media is not so much reporting news, but actually reporting a script, a script coming directly out of the corporate executive. Just because the Lancashire Telegraph report, reported the  ’official story’, does not in any way imply they reported the truth, of course what this event is suggesting is the fact not only are the police and fire service reciting the corporate script, so are the teachers. This is very disturbing.

So what is the corporate script? it is the script laid out in the Contingency Act 2004, which has become the whole politic of all our democratic system. Politics deals in Contingency, the Adam Street Gang deals in the running of our country.


Liverpool

What exactly is the meaning of this garbage, and more to the point why are the people still doing and saying nothing?


part1sf

Click Image To Enlarge And Activate


 

The Whole Event In Chronological Order

The Drill Event : UK : Elite Drill In Preventing Schools From Releasing Children From School

I Ask Questions : UK Schools Holding Children Inside The School

I Take Action : Informing Parents Of The Other Side To The Child Withholding Drill

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

My Second Action : lifeinthemix Presents Formal Letter

Peel Park Respond : Lancashire County Council Solicitor Lynn Brewer Responds For Peel Park School

Governors Respond : Peel Park Foundation School Governors Reply

Complaints Made Against Peel Park School And Associated Institutions

Information Commissioners Office Reply…Eventually


 

Further Study

In Profile : Peel Park Foundation School

Lancashire Resilience Forum Freedom of Information Response

Homosexuals brainwashing our children in elementary schools

In Profile : Moodle The Virtual Environment

Request Denied By Peel Park To Allow My Son To Bring Home Exercise Books

 

And For The Controlling Force Behind The Contingency :

In Profile : The John Adam Street Gang

In Profile : Contingency And Resilience Why The Country Is Not Working



____________________________________

__________________

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in A. THE DRILL, ACC. PEEL PARK PRIMARY SCHOOL : DECEPTION & LIES, COVERUPS, DISPLACEMENT, FRAUDULENT POWERS | 1 Comment »

Understanding Psychiatry : Psychiatrists And Other Professionals On Psychiatry

Posted by admin on 15th August 2009

How Strange This World…The Insane Treat The Sane Until They Themselves Are Also Insane… So Say The Madmen


B0005787


Source : Multiple


Psychiatrist and Other Professionals on Psychiatry


If you want to find out about psychiatry, you can’t do much better than listen to the psychiatrists themselves. They will tell you exactly what they think about the human condition, what can be done about it, and how they believe the sane man (and therefore the ideal society) should function.

Others have come to their senses and know exactly what’s going on. Those few who have the courage to speak out against the majority in their profession deserve attention as well. Read on for some eye-opening quotes from those who are supposed to be “protectors” of your mental health.

The mental health establishment has snowed the American people: it launches the most unimaginable brutal psychological and physical assault on human beings in distress, calls this ‘medical treatment’, and then blames the outcome on ‘mental illness’.

—Seth Farber, Ph.D., scholar


_____________________________________________


On This Page :

Do psychiatrists really know anything about the mind?

Psychiatry’s Hidden Agenda

Some of the horrors you can expect from psychiatric “treatment”

The pseudo-science called “psychiatry”

The promotion of deviant behavior

Human beings are laboratory rats to be experimented on

Psychiatry’s overall political agenda for mind control


_______________________________________________________

Do psychiatrists really know anything about the mind?

Bruce Wiseman, CCHR Spokesman – from the booklet “Psychiatry and the Creation of Senseless Violence”

“Even Ritalin’s manufacturer warns that “frank psychotic episodes can occur” with abusive use. While the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders states that the major complication of Ritalin withdrawal is suicide.”

Dr. David Kaiser, psychiatrist

“Unfortunately what I also see these days are the casualties of this new biological psychiatry (i.e., drug treatment), as patients come to me with many years of past treatment. Patients have been diagnosed with chemical imbalances despite the fact that no test exists to support such a claim, and that there is no real conception of what a correct chemical balance would look like. Patients have years of medication which have done nothing except reify* in them an identity as a chronic patient with a bad brain. This identification as a biologically-impaired patient is one of the most destructive effects of biological psychiatry…At the level of individual patients this means a growing number of overdiagnosed, overmedicated, and disarticulated* people less able to control their own identities and lives.”

.*reify = to make (an abstraction) material or concrete

*disarticulated = not able to put one’s thoughts and feelings into words easily

“… modern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biological cause of any single mental illness … Patients [have] been diagnosed with ‘chemical imbalances’ despite the fact that no test exists to support such a claim, and … there is no real conception of what a correct chemical balance would look like.”

—”Commentary Against Biological Psychiatry”, Psychiatric Times, December 1996 N. McLaren, MD, Australian psychiatrist, 1999

“The fields of human psychology and psychiatry are … a mess of competing but fundamentally incompatible theories … Academic psychiatry has all but lost contact with the population it is supposed to serve … Criticism is, if not actiely discouraged, then politely but very firmly ignored.”

Walter Afield, psychiatrist, 1994

“What’s happening in the training of psychiatrists and in the quality of a psychiatrist is that they have become drug pushers. They have … forgotten how to sit down and talk to patients as to what their problems are.”

Dr. Fred A. Baughman Jr., Pediatric Neurologist – from  ”Malpractice and Violation of Informed Consent”

“… in 40 years, ‘biological psychiatry’ has yet to validate a single psychiatric condition/diagnosis as an abnormality/disease, or as anything ‘neurological’, ‘biological’, ‘chemically imbalanced’, or ‘genetic’.”


Ron Leifer, psychiatrist, quoted in Beverly Eakman’s book,  ”Cloning of the American Mind”, 1997

“Everyone is neurotic. I have no trouble giving out diagnoses. In my office I only see abnormal people. Out of my office, I see only normal people. It’s up to me. It’s just a joke. This is what I mean by this fraud, this arrogant fraud … To make some kind of pretension that this is a scientific statement is … damaging to the culture.”

Dr. Joseph Glenmullen, Clinical Instructor in Psychiatry Harvard Medical School, 2000

“We do not have proof either of the cause of the physiology for any psychiatric diagnosis … In the absence of any verifiable diseases, in recent decades, psychopharmacology has not hesitated to construct ‘disease models’ for psychiatric diagnoses.”

Dr. Sydney Walker III, psychiatrist, “The Hyperactivity Hoax”

“Hyperactivity is not a disease. It’s a hoax perpetrated by doctors who have no idea what’s really wrong with these children.”

Frank Sulloway, professor of psychology, quoted in John Horgan’s book, “The Undiscovered Mind”

“Freud was wrong in almost every important respect.”


R.D. Laing, psychiatrist, “Wisdom, Madness, and Folly”, p. 126

.“What do you do when you don’t know what to do? No wonder there are more suicides among psychiatrists than in any other profession.”

E. Fuller Torrey, psychiatrist, “Nowhere to Go”, New York: Harper and Row, 1988

“Over the years it [the National Committee for Mental Hygiene] has championed for the promotion of ‘mental health’ despite the fact that nobody knows what it is or how to do it.”

“Many psychiatrists have had, at least to some degree, the unsettling and bewildering feeling that what they have been doing has been largely worthless and that the premises on which they have based their professional lives were partly fraudulent.”

Frankwood E. Williams, Director, National Committee for Mental Hygiene, “Is there a Mental Hygiene”, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1932, p. 113-20

“The basic question with which psychiatrists and particularly those interested in mental hygiene start is — What are the causes of mental and nervous disease? This question has been repeatedly raised during the twenty-two years of organized mental hygiene until it has almost become a ritual and like a ritual has led to nothing except repetition — not even a start.”

 

____________________________________________________


Psychiatry’s Hidden Agenda

Carl Elliot, Bioethicist, University of Minnesota, 2001

“The way to sell drugs is to sell psychiatric illness.”

Johann Christian Reil (who first coined the word “psychiatry”), 1810

“Through strong, painful impressions we capture the patient’s attention, accustom him to unconditional obedience, and indelibly imprint in his heart the feeling of necessity. The will of his superior must be such a firm, immutable law for him that he will no more resist it than he would rebel against the elements.”


Abraham Myerson, psychiatrist, quoted in Bruce Wiseman’s “Psychiatry, the Ultimate Betrayal”

“The reduction of intelligence is an important factor in the curative process … The fact is that some of the very best cures that one gets are in those individuals whom one reduces almost to amentia [feeblemindedness].”

Sir John Rawlings Rees, Tavistock psychiatrist, “Strategic Planning for Mental Health”, Mental Health, v.1 no.4, p. 103-6

“If we are to infiltrate the professional and social activities of other people I think we must imitate the Totalitarians and organize some kind of fifth column activity. If better ideas on mental health are to progress and spread we, as the salesmen, must lose our identity … Let us all, therefore, very secretly be ‘fifth columnists’.”


William Menninger, President, American Psychiatric Association “New Directions in American Psychiatry” 1944-1968, p. 79

“Our Committee on Preventive Psychiatry is recommending that we assume citizenship responsibilities for policy forming at whatever level we can — in the Board of Education, City Council, civic clubs, welfare groups, legislative committees, Congressional hearings … We can exert an effective influence on the betterment of mental health …”

Mike Gorman, psychiatric publicist, remarking on National Institute of Mental Health fundraising tactics in Drew, “The Health Syndicate”, The Atlantic Monthly, December 1967, P. 76

“[it is] a high class kind of subversion, very high class. We’re not second story burglars. We go right in the front door.”


___________________________________________________

Some of the horrors you can expect from psychiatric “treatment.”

Dr. Sydney Walker III, psychiatrist, The Hyperactivity Hoax

“… a child who sees a DSM-oriented doctor is almost assured of a psychiatric label and a prescription, even if the child is perfectly fine. … This willy-nilly labeling of virtually everyone as mentally ill is a serious danger to healthy children, because virtually all children have enough symptoms to get a DSM label and a drug.”


Leo T. Alexander, psychiatrist, “The Suppression of the Clonic Phase in Electrically Induced Convulsions in Man”, Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, April, 1952, p. 182

“I produced painful, though otherwise fortunately harmless, spinal fractures (2 of them multiple) in 3 patients in fairly rapid succession.”

Franz G. Alexander and Sheldon Selesnick, psychiatrists, describing psychosurgery (lobotomy) in The History of Psychiatry: An Evaluation of Psychiatric Thought from Prehistoric Times to the Present, p.285

“an area essential to the human being – his personality – is forever destroyed.”

Dr. Sergei Zapoulskalov, psychiatrist

“Today in Russia, children who have difficulties with studying are not placed into parents’ or teachers’ hands, but into psychologists’ ones. From there they go to psychiatrists who cannot offer anything better than psychotropic drugs. I have ever seen a teenager helped by them, but I know of a great number of incidents where such drugs have led to dependence and depression …”

David Kaiser, psychiatrist, Against Biological Psychiatry, 1996

“…years of medication … have done nothing except reify in them an identity as a chronic patient with a bad brain. This identification as a biologically-impaired patient is one of the most destructive effects of biologic psychiatry. At the level of the individual patients this means a growing number of over-diagnosed, overmedicated and disarticulated people less able to define and control their own identities and lives.”


Dr. Bevan Cant, psychiatric registrar, quoted in David Smith, “Patients Hit with Massive Overdoses”, 1988

“In emergencies we offer [a major tranquilizer]; if refused, we stand several staff around and re-offer. If again refused, it is ‘grab and jab’.”


Dr. Robert Morgan, 1966, quoted in Bruce Wiseman’s “Psychiatry, the Ultimate Betrayal”

“..[E]ven one or two ECT treatments risk limbic damage in the brain leading to retarded speed, coordination, handwriting, concentration, attention span, memory, response flexibility, and re-education. On the psychological side, fear of ECT has produced stress ulcers, renal disease, confusion, amnesiac withdrawal, and resistance to re-educative or psychological therapy. The research thus indicated that ECT was a slower-acting lobotomy with the added complications of shock-induced terror.”


Lee Coleman, psychiatrist, “The Case Against ECT”, 1977

“The brain for a while, is so injured that the patient is too confused to know or remember what was troubling him … when the brain begins to recover … the problems usually return since electricity has done nothing to resolve them.”

“The changes one sees when electroshock is administered are completely consistent with any acute brain injury, such as a blow to the head from a hammer. In essence, what happens is that the individual is dazed, confused, and disoriented, and therefore cannot remember or appreciate current problems.”

Moira Dolan, internist, quoted in Thomas S. Szasz, “Cruel Compassion”, 1994

“The fact remains that electric shock to the brain is a haphazardly applied, brain-damaging procedure.”


Thomas Maeder, clinical psychologist, “Wounded Healers”, Atlantic Monthly, January, 1989, p. 38

“…every person who comes into this office who has had an experience with another therapist has some kind of horror story to tell, about some major failing on the therapist’s part, including, quite often, sexual abuse, verbal abuse, things that cross the boundary of mere bad technique and come pretty damn close to the criminal.”


Dr. Robert Byck, former professor of psychiatry and pharmacology, Yale Medical School

“We have given a great deal of cocaine to many individuals…”

Jovan Raskovi, psychiatrist, quoted in “Bosnia: Ending the Religious Genocide, The Crusader, August, 1993

“I made the preparations for this war … If I hadn’t created this emotional strain in the Serbian people, nothing would have happened.”


____________________________________________________

The pseudo-science called “psychiatry”

DSM III (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual), edition 3, published by the American Psychiatric Association

“For most of the DSM-III disorders … the etiology [cause] is unknown. A variety of theories have been advanced, buttressed by evidence not always convincing to explain how these disorders come about.”

David Rosenhan, professor of psychology, Stanford University, in “On Being Sane in Insane Places”, Science 179 (1973): 250-258

“The facts of the matter are that we have known for a long time that diagnoses are often not useful or reliable, but we have nevertheless continued to use them. We now know that we cannot distinguish insanity from sanity.”


Paul Mullen, Professor of Forensic Psychiatry, Australia (1999)

“We are going in there [the brain] with the equivalent of a bulldozer to knock down roads and tear up rail lines and pull down telegraph exchanges. You have to ask, do we know enough to play these kinds of games with other people’s brains?”

National Institute of Health Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of ADHD, 1998

“We don’t have an independent, valid test for ADHD; there are no data to indicate that ADHD is due to a brain malfunction … and finally, after years of clinical research and experience with ADHD, our knowledge about the cause or causes of ADHD remains speculative.”

Heinz Lehmann, psychiatrist, “Discussion: A Renaissance of Psychiatric Diagnosis?” American Journal of Psychiatry 125, supplement 10 (1969): 43-46

“Psychiatric diagnosis in many quarters today has deteriorated from being a fine and useful craft into an ill-regulated, superficial, unconvincing, and therefore often useless procedure.”


Dr. Thomas Szasz, psychiatrist, 2000

“There is not one iota of evidence that addiction is a brain disease.”

Loren R. Mosher, M. D., Former Chief of the Center for Studies of Schizophrenia, The National Institute of Mental Health, in his letter of resignation to the APA

“Finally, why must the APA pretend to know more than it does? DSM IV [the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Edition 4] is the fabrication upon which psychiatry seeks acceptance by medicine in general. Insiders know it is more a political than scientific document. … It is the way to get paid.”

Dr. Walter Fisher, Assistant Superintendent, Elgin State Hospital, “Power, Greed, and Stupidity in the Mental Health Racket”

“The field of mental health is highly subjective, capricious, and dominated by whims, mythologies, and public relations. In many ways it is a pop culture with endless fads but with no real substance.”

Barry Nurcombe, Director of child and adolescent psychiatry, Vanderbilt University

“…the best [psychiatric] diagnoses are provisional and somewhat fictional.”

E. Fuller Torrey, psychiatrist, “Nowhere to Go”

“Despite the proliferation of child guidance clinics and their popularity, no evidence was brought forth to suggest that the clinics prevented mental illness.”


____________________________________________________________

The promotion of deviant behavior

G. Brock Chisholm, past president, World Federation for Mental Health

Psychiatry: Journal of the Biology and the Pathology of Interpersonal Relations, February 1946, p. 9

“The re-interpretation and eventually eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy.”

“If the race is to be freed from its crippling burden of good and evil, it must be psychiatrists who take the original responsibility.”

Steve Baldwin, clinical psychologist, quoted in Rhonda Siddall, “Psychiatrists Back Electric Shock for Children”, London Observer, 3 July 1994

“ECT on minors is never appropriate … [it] is a corruption of fundamental human rights.”

Dr. Al Parides, Professor of Psychiatry, UCLA from an interview given on December 17, 1993, quoted in Psychiatry, The Ultimate Betrayal by Bruce Wiseman

“… psychiatry promotes a certain form of morality that is a deviant morality in regard to many areas including sexual behavior …”


_____________________________________________________

 

Human beings are laboratory rats to be experimented on

Harry Bailey, psychiatrist, justifying experiments on Blacks

“[it was] cheaper to use Niggers than cats because they were everywhere and cheap experimental animals.”

World Health Organization report, “Apartheid and Health”, 1983

“In no other medical field in South Africa, is the contempt of the person cultivated by racism more concisely portrayed than in psychiatry.”


Jovan Raskovic, psychiatrist, Luda Zemlya, 1990

“Serbs by nature possess the qualities of authority with certain aggressive and open elements… Muslims are fixated on the anal phase … Their character tends to appropriate things, dominate like a boss, value people by their possessions, their money, their social position, etc….[Croats] are fixated on the castration complex … under perpetual fear of castration, losing something that belongs only to himself.”

Dr. P. Henning, psychiatrist, quoted in Peace and Freedom, S.A. January, 1976, with reference to ECT use in South Africa

“It’s simply too expensive, too slow and too risky. Africans appear to be more susceptible to the effects of anaesthetics and because we treat more Africans than Whites, we would have to double our staff if we used anaesthetics.”

Benjamin Rush, widely acknowledged as the Father of American Psychiatry, “Medical Inquiries and Observations upon the Diseases of the Mind” (1812)

“However well they [black people] appear to be satisfied with their color, there are many proofs of their preferring that of the white people.”


Francis Galton, psychologist quoted in Lenny Lapon’s “Mass Murderers in White Coats” (Springfield, Mass., Psychiatric Genocide Research Institute, 1986), p. 75

“The Jews are specialized for a parasitical existence upon other nations. … The average intellectual standard of the negro [sic] is some two grades below our own.”


August Forel, psychiatrist, quoted in Bernhardt Schreiber (San Francisco, Section 5 Books, 1983), p. 11-12

“Even for their own good the blacks must be treated as what they are, an absolutely subordinate, inferior, lower type of men, incapable themselves of culture. That must once and for all be clearly stated.”


Carl C. Bell, M.D., President and CEO of the Community Mental Health Council, Chicago

“I’m certain that racism is embedded in the roots of medicine and psychiatry.”

Eugen Fischer, psychiatrist, The Principles of Human Heredity and Racial Hygiene, 1939

“The Jew is such an alien and, therefore, when he wants to insinuate himself, he must be warded off. This is self-defense. In saying this, I do not characterize every Jew as inferior, as Negroes are, and I do not underestimate the greatest enemy with whom we have to fight …”


___________________________________________________

Psychiatry’s overall political agenda of mind control

Dr. Jose M. R. Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School, U.S. Congressional Record, 1974

“We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated … Man does not have the right to develop his own mind.”

G. Brock Chisholm, psychiatrist and co-founder of the World Federation for Mental Health, 1945

“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.”

Carlos F. MacDonald, head of the American Medico-Psychological Association (precursor to the American Psychiatric Association) “American Journal of Insanity”, July, 1914, quoted in Castel, Castel and Lovell, The Psychiatric Society, 1982

“That a radical cure of the evils incident to the dependent mentally defective classes would be effected if every feeble-minded person, every imbecile, every habitual criminal, every manifestly weak-minded person, and every confirmed inebriate were sterilized, is a self-evident proposition. By this means we could practically, if not absolutely, arrest, in a decade or two, the reproduction of mentally defective persons, as surely as we could stamp out smallpox absolutely if every person in the world could be vaccinated.”


Adolf Hitler, mass murderer (and psychiatric patient), “Mein Kampf”, p. 255

“Those who are physically and mentally unhealthy and unworthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the body of their children.”

Antonio Guidi, Neuropsychiatrist, Deputy Health Minister, Italy

“Authorizing the sales of [methylphenidate] for children is like physically torturing them … it is like ECT … even if it were true that three percent of children need it, I would rather see them treated with alternative methods.”


German Society of Psychiatrists (DGPPN), In Memorium, August 1999

“[psychiatrists had been] active in and primarily responsible for the different euthanasia organizations [in Nazi Germany].”


Thomas Szasz, psychiatrist, “Cruel Compassion”, 1994

“The young and the old are defenseless against relatives who want to get rid of them by casting them into the role of mental patient, and against psychiatrists whose livelihood depends on defining them as mentally ill.”

“The child psychiatrist’s authority is altogether beyond the reach of his denominated patients. This elementary fact makes the child psychiatrist one of the most dangerous enemies not only of children, but also of adults who care for the two precious and most vulnerable things in life – children and liberty. Child psychology and child psychiatry cannot be reformed. They must be abolished.”

“Today, hundreds of thousands of children are imprisoned in psychiatric hospitals, most of them, even according to psychiatric authorities, unnecessarily.”

Sigmund Freud, psychologist, quoted in CCHR, “Psychiatry Manipulating Creativity”, 1997

“Meaning is but little with these men [artists], all they care about is line, shape, agreement of contours.”


Martin Grotjahn, psychiatrist, quoted in CCHR, “Psychiatry Manipulating Creativity”, 1997

“Actors are almost impossible to treat successfully.”

www.psychdisorders.org/reviews.html


__________________________

_____________


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in ACC. PEEL PARK PRIMARY SCHOOL : DECEPTION & LIES, CHILD ABUSE, PSYCHIATRY | 1 Comment »